The Economics of Corruption

October, Saturday 29th | 11-13hs

Contributed Session CS42

Room 232

 
Chair: Federico Weinschelbaum, Universidad de San Andrés
 
 

 

The Effect of Corruption on Bidding Behavior in First-Price Auctions

 

 

 

Session: The Economics of Corruption

 

 

Presenter

Leandro Arozamena, Universidad Torcuato Di Tella, Argentina

 

 

Author(s)

Leandro Arozamena, Universidad Torcuato Di Tella, Argentina

Federico Weinschelbaum, Universidad de San Andrés, Argentina

 

 

Sponsor

The Tinker Foundation Scholarship

 

 

 

 

If the owner of an object sells it through an auction run by an agent of hers, corruption may appear. In a first-price auction, corruption can make honest bidders more or less aggressive. We identify sufficient conditions for each possibility. We analyze the effects of corruption on efficiency, bidders' welfare and revenue, and study how it influences the number of bidders. Our results apply, as a particular case, to the situation where one of the bidders is granted a right of first refusal.

 

 

  Download this paper in PDF

 

 
 
 
 

 

The Political Economy of Corruption and the Role of Financial Institutions

 

 

 

Session: The Economics of Corruption

 

 

Presenter

Kira Boerner, University of Munich

 

 

Author(s)

Kira Boerner, University of Munich

Christa Hainz, University of Munich, CESifo and The William Davidson Institute

 

 

 

 

In developing countries, we observe high levels of corruption even if they have democratic political systems. This is surprising from a political economy perspective, as the majority generally suffers from high corruption levels. We show that a lack of financial institutions can lead to more corruption as more voters are part of the corrupt system. Well-functioning financial institutions, in turn, can increase the political support for anti-corruption measures.

 

 

  Download this paper in PDF

 

 
 
 
 

 

Corruption, Political Accountability, and Decentralization in Developing Countries

 

 

 

Session: The Economics of Corruption

 

 

Presenter

Oskar Nupia, Universitat Pompeu Fabra

 

 

Author(s)

Oskar Nupia, Universitat Pompeu Fabra

 

 

 

 

Does decentralization reduce corruption in developing countries? What can explain the decentralization success or failure in combating corruption in these economies? Using cross-country information we show that decentralization does not have any effect on corruption in developing countries. Modelling corruption and political accountability we show that the increment of the local elites’ power, the large between-jurisdictions income inequality, and the transfers’ design may explain these results

 

 

  Download this paper in PDF

 

 
 
 
 

 

On the Individual Decisions to Commit Corruption: a Methodological Complement

 

 

 

Session: The Economics of Corruption

 

 

Presenter

Eduardo Rodriguez-Oreggia, Universidad Iberoamericana, México

 

 

Author(s)

Eduardo Rodriguez-Oreggia, Universidad Iberoamericana, México

Manuel Alejandro Guerrero, Universidad Iberoamericana, México

 

 

Sponsor

The LACEA-GDN Scholarship

 

 

 

 

 

 

This paper focuses determine the behavior of citizens in participating in corruption acts focusing in Mexico and using both quantitative and qualitative methods. There is trade-off between perceptions, social dynamics and individual incentives for corrupt behavior within an institutional framework, which creates a kind of vicious circle difficult to break up.

 

 

  Download this paper in PDF

 

 
 
 
 

 

Incentives with Non-Profit Objectives: Microfinance Agents and the Selection of Very Poor Borrowers

 

 

 

Session: The Economics of Corruption

 

 

Presenter

Cecile Aubert, EURIsCO, Université de Paris Dauphine

 

 

Author(s)

Cecile Aubert, EURIsCO, Université de Paris Dauphine

Elisabeth Sadoulet, University of California at Berkeley and Giannini Foundation

Alain de Janvry, University of California at Berkeley and Giannini Foundation

 

 

 

 

Both for-profit and pro-poor microfinance institutions (MFIs) use incentive pay schemes for their credit agents to induce information acquisition on borrowers. But when repayment and wealth are positively correlated, non-profit MFIs trying to reach very poor borrowers need to use costly random audits on the share of very poor borrowers selected. When richer borrowers can bribe agents, a pro-poor MFI can reduce agents' wages and lend more to the poor, turning some collusion to its advantage.

 

 

  Download this paper in PDF

 

 
 
 
 

 

A Note on Wealth as a Corruption-Controlling Device

 

 

 

Session: The Economics of Corruption

 

 

Presenter

Federico Weinschelbaum, Universidad de San Andrés

 

 

Author(s)

Federico Weinschelbaum, Universidad de San Andrés

Rafael Di Tella, Harvard Business School

 

 

Sponsor

The LACEA-GDN Scholarship

 

 

 

 

 

 

The overwhelming majority of cases where corrupt politicians have been punished involve the detection of consumption levels that appear to be too high. The informativeness of an agent’s level of consumption depends negatively on his initial level of wealth. This introduces a tendency to choose poor agents as they are easier to monitor. More generally, we show that, even if agents have similar preferences, there are contractual advantages to selecting particular types.

 

 

  Download this paper in PDF