| |
|
|
|
Date |
May 25, 2005 |
| |
|
|
Place |
UNESCO |
| |
|
|
Conference Organizer |
The American University of Paris |
| |
|
|
Sponsors |
|
The Trustee Fund for the
Advancement of Scholarship |
|
|
|
Alphaprim |
|
| |
|
|
Contact |
Perrine Delobelle (delobelle@aup.fr) |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
Josep Colomer |
|
|
|
Josep Colomer
is a Research Professor in Political Science, at
the Higher Council of Scientific Research (CSIC),
and at the University Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona.
Professor Colomer has held visiting appointments
in Paris, Chicago, New York, Washington and
Mexico. He is the author of more than 120 book
chapters and academic articles in international
journals, published in six languages, especially
on democratization, elections and electoral
systems, and comparative political institutions.
He is also author or editor of 28 books,
including Political Institutions (Oxford
University Press), and the Handbook of
Electoral System Choice (Palgrave-Macmillan)
that received the Leon Weaver Award 2004 on
Representation and electoral systems of the
American Political Science Association. He has
also been consultant for constitutional reforms
for the governments of Colombia, Estonia, Haiti,
Mexico, Spain and Catalonia. |
|
|
|
"Constitutional
Consequences"
Different constitutional formulas have different
consequences on politics, policy and the polity. Constitutions favoring
concentration of power, such as those regulating parliamentary regimes with
majoritarian electoral rules, favor relatively stable single-party governments,
while multiparty coalition governments typical of parliamentary regimes with
proportional representation tend to be less durable. However, single-party
governments, as well as presidential governments with a president’s party
majority in the assembly and fixed terms, tend to produce more changing and
unstable policies than those relying upon the support of multiple parties or
inter-institutional agreements. Empirical correlations between constitutional
formulas and economic growth and development are weak, which suggests that the
former may have only remote, indirect consequences on the latter. There is a
historical trend in favor of constitutional formulas permitting relatively high
levels of social inclusiveness, political pluralism, policy stability and
democracy endurance, which reflects the relatively greater capability of
pluralistic formulas to satisfy citizens’ political preferences and generate
endogenous support. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Georges de Ménil |
|
|
|
Georges de Ménil
is Professor of Economics at the Ecole de Hautes
Etudes en Sciences Sociales, Paris, and a member
of the governing council of the research center PSE.
From 1997 through 2000, he was the economic
advisor of three successive Prime Ministers of
Romania, and director of the Private Pension
Reform Task Force of the Ministry of Labor in
Bucharest. In 1995 and 1996, he co-directed a
group of economic advisors for the Government
and President of Ukraine. He is co-founder and
senior editor of the quarterly review Economic
Policy. He was formerly head of the Quarterly
Forecasting Model Group of the Ministry of
Finance in Paris. He served many years on the
Board of Directors of Schlumberger Ltd. He has a
BA in history from Harvard, and a PhD in
economics from MIT. He has written about
social security reform, European integration,
and the European Constitution. He recently
edited (with Thierry Chopin) Quelle
Constitution pour l'Europe? Other books include
Economic Summitry (with Anthony Solomon),
A
Comparative Analysis of Stabilization Policy:
France and Germany (with Uwe Westphal), and
Ukrainian Economic Reform: The Unfinished Agenda
(with Anders Aslund). |
|
|
|
"The Economic
Implications of the Social Provisions of the EU Constitution"
The drafting and passage of the Treaty providing a
Constitution for Europe is a new phase in the development of the Union. In this
new phase, will EU institutions become an obstacle to liberalization and growth?
The talk will identify the following four central features of the Constitutional
Treaty from an economic point of view: the clarification of the 'acquis', the
increased authority of the Council, the increased authority of the
democratically elected Parliament and the scope of new social provisions. The
Treaty for the Constitution for Europe provides potential to stimulate
productivity growth in the Union. However, the social provisions of the Treaty
are not favorable to productivity growth. They will tend to limit competition
between Member States and, displace the resolution of societal issues from the
legislative arena to the European Court of Justice. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Russell Hardin
|
|
|
|
Russell Hardin
is Professor of Politics at New York University.
Among other activities, Professor Hardin is a
Rhodes Scholar, Guggenheim, Earhart and Honorary
Woodrow Wilson fellow. He has been a Visiting
Scholar in Paris, Italy and Australia. Other
fellowships include the American Association for
the Advancement of Science, the American Academy
of Arts and Sciences and the Hoover Institution,
Stanford University. Professor Hardin
specializes in rational choice, collective
action, morality behind the law, moral and
political philosophy. His recent publications
include Liberalism, Constitutionalism, and
Democracy (Oxford University Press), as well as
Trust and Trustworthiness (Russell Sage
Foundation) and Indeterminacy and Society
(Princeton University Press). |
|
|
|
"The Weakness of
Constitutions"
A constitution is a weak instrument. Constitutions work
when the populations that they govern are easily coordinated on doing what the
constitution sets out for them to do. If a people is readily coordinated on, for
example, social order, then a constitution and the institutions that it puts in
place can enable them to achieve social order. It could enable a deeply
religious population who share the same religion to govern according to the
religion's precepts. It could allow a relatively individualistic, liberal
society, such as most of the nations of Europe and North America today, to
achieve a liberal society in which no strong system of values of any of the
diverse groups governs. When a constitution governs an individualist society, it
must be relatively limited in its scope and perhaps it must often even be vague. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adam Przeworski |
|
|
|
Adam Przeworski
is the Carroll and Milton Petrie Professor of Politics
at
New York University. Professor Przeworski
previously taught at the University of Chicago,
where he was the Martin A. Ryerson Distinguished
Service Professor, and held visiting
appointments in India, Chile, France, Germany,
Spain, and Switzerland. A member of the American
Academy of Arts and Sciences since 1991, he is
the recipient of the 2001 Woodrow Wilson Prize
and the author of thirteen books and numerous
articles. He has a PhD in Political Science
from Northwestern University. His recent
publications include States and Markets (New
York: Cambridge University Press, 2003),
Democracy and the Rule of Law (New York:
Cambridge University Press, 2003), and Democracy
and Development (New York: Cambridge University
Press, 2000). |
|
|
|
"Political Institutions and Economic
Development: The Role of Accountability Mechanisms"
Adam Przeworski examined the impact of political
institutions on economic development in the world between 1950 and 2000,
focusing on the role of elections as a mechanism of accountability, and taking
into account the fact that different types of institutions function under
different conditions. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conference
Moderator:
Professor
Paul Godt,
Department of International Affairs and
Politics, The American
University of Paris. |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|